Gentoo Archives: gentoo-scm

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-scm@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-scm] Git Validation - Update
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:39:16
Message-Id: CA+czFiAVE4+9vycwyEGjbD8mbAZeULBHma2_LMJORUQxDaNq8A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-scm] Git Validation - Update by Michael Mol
1 On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
3 >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote:
4 >>> Whatever way it runs is fine IMO. Even if we have to throw money on
5 >>> it to make the migration happen I still think the NRE to move from
6 >>> the working platform you've created is overkill for the Gentoo
7 >>> migration.
8 >>>
9 >>
10 >> I think the money is a non-issue. Even with non-spot instances 100
11 >> nodes for an hour is $50. The time to copy files back/forth/etc is
12 >> probably a bigger issue. No harm in continuing to explore options,
13 >> but as I said I will be moving towards getting the full validation
14 >> going end-to-end before I do any optimization, and others are more
15 >> than welcome to pick up the git half.
16 >
17 > Bittorrent may help. I'll admit not following too closely (closing on
18 > a house next week. Then moving.), but if it's possible to lump the
19 > data and roll a torrent, you could have the ec2 instances feed each
20 > other.
21
22 Even better, manual copy to the first instance, torrent to the rest.
23 The raw data only crosses network boundaries once, that way, and
24 nobody's fighting for your home upstream.
25
26
27 --
28 :wq