Gentoo Archives: gentoo-scm

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-scm@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-scm] Git Validation - Update
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:37:30
Message-Id: CA+czFiDOohRx4QP-iN223jVmjb9Rs6abXjvsgm3Ff=sDX-VAjw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-scm] Git Validation - Update by Rich Freeman
1 On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote:
3 >> Whatever way it runs is fine IMO. Even if we have to throw money on
4 >> it to make the migration happen I still think the NRE to move from
5 >> the working platform you've created is overkill for the Gentoo
6 >> migration.
7 >>
8 >
9 > I think the money is a non-issue. Even with non-spot instances 100
10 > nodes for an hour is $50. The time to copy files back/forth/etc is
11 > probably a bigger issue. No harm in continuing to explore options,
12 > but as I said I will be moving towards getting the full validation
13 > going end-to-end before I do any optimization, and others are more
14 > than welcome to pick up the git half.
15
16 Bittorrent may help. I'll admit not following too closely (closing on
17 a house next week. Then moving.), but if it's possible to lump the
18 data and roll a torrent, you could have the ec2 instances feed each
19 other.
20
21 --
22 :wq

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-scm] Git Validation - Update Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>