| 1 |
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:57:14PM +0200, Christian Hoenig wrote: |
| 2 |
> This is kind of an RFC... |
| 3 |
> As I currently (and most likely in the future, too) read gentoo-announce and |
| 4 |
> the GLSA titles have become very long lately, I'd suggest to put the affected |
| 5 |
> package name in front of the GLSA-title. With the current scheme, the names |
| 6 |
> of the affected packages are most of the time outside of my mail clients |
| 7 |
> header view so that I have to open each mail and look which pkg is the |
| 8 |
> affected one. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Give me your oppinions on this :-) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Yes yes! This would be a wonderful idea. I use Mutt as my mailer and |
| 13 |
currently the affected package almost always gets cut off on the end of |
| 14 |
the title. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
This would be a great and easy change to make. As far as I can tell, there |
| 17 |
are few drawbacks to doing it this way. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Dan |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
/--------------- - - - - - - |
| 23 |
| Dan Noe, freelance hacker |
| 24 |
| http://isomerica.net/ |
Archives