1 |
Martin Pajak schreef: |
2 |
> Martin Zwickel schrieb: |
3 |
>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 13:37:04 +0200 |
4 |
>> Ochal Christophe <ochal@××××××.be> bubbled: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> Hi, |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> I've been looking for a way to use our internal gentoo box (file - & |
9 |
>>> printserver) to also cache windowsupdates & mac updates. |
10 |
|
11 |
>> Isn't Windows able to distribute patches from one machine over network? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Yes, of course. If you have a Windows 2000/2003 server, there is a |
14 |
> package (SUS = Software Update Services) intended to do this. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Helpfull link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Server_Update_Services |
17 |
|
18 |
The problem with these tools is that they aren't transparent, squid |
19 |
seems like a far better choice for our situation (new machines & |
20 |
repairs), however, i've found various conflicting info on this, will |
21 |
have to test it to find out. |
22 |
-- |
23 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |