1 |
Hello list, |
2 |
|
3 |
Is it me, or does it just seem like there are lots of bugs, vulns, and |
4 |
problems with Samba 3.x? |
5 |
|
6 |
I would have preferred to stay with 2 (having no need for the extra features |
7 |
of 3), but the ebuilds dried up a while ago. |
8 |
|
9 |
> GLSA 200411-21 will be updated shortly and I think a Samba advisory is |
10 |
> coming. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> On Monday 15 November 2004 12:14, Marc Ballarin wrote: |
13 |
> > Hi, |
14 |
> > it seems, that samba <=3.0.7 contains an additional, more severe |
15 |
> > vulnerability besides the DoS described in |
16 |
> > http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200411-21.xml |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > According to |
19 |
> > http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/132004.html , |
20 |
> > samba <=3.0.7 contains a vulnerabilty, that allows remote code injection |
21 |
> > and execution. |
22 |
> > This has been fixed in samba 3.0.8 as well, but no advisory has been |
23 |
> > released, since the samba developers believed the bug to be |
24 |
> > non-exploitable. |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > Marc |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > -- |
29 |
> > gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
|
33 |
Random russian saying: A lizard on a cushion will still seek leaves. |
34 |
|
35 |
jabber: jcalum@××××××××××××.uk |
36 |
pgp: http://gk.umtstrial.co.uk/~calum/keys.php |
37 |
Linux 2.6.7-hardened-r7 12:21:20 up 1 day, 1:54, 1 user, load average: 0.10, |
38 |
0.15, 0.09 |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |