| 1 |
Dnia czw 18. marca 2004 19:07, Joel Osburn napisa³: |
| 2 |
> Referring to Mateusz Neumann's post: |
| 3 |
> > revdep-rebuild --soname libssl.so.0.9.6 |
| 4 |
> > revdep-rebuild --soname libssl.so.0.9.7 |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> When I run revdep-rebuild, it says "Checking dynamic linking...". |
| 7 |
> Aren't packages that are dynamically linked ones that don't require a |
| 8 |
> recompile? I though that was the whole point of dynamic linking... |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The point is that apps are linked against libcrypt.so.0.9.6 for instance. So |
| 11 |
when you replace it with *.so.0.9.7, the linker cannot find 0.9.6 version. |
| 12 |
Dynamic linking makes it unnecessary for you to recompile everything after |
| 13 |
upgrading from 0.9.7 to 0.9.7d, because even though the file version changes, |
| 14 |
it's name (or at least a name of symbolic link and binary interface) doesn't |
| 15 |
change and the linker can find it, load it and app can use it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Regards, |
| 18 |
Piotr Kalinowski |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
* Registered Linux User no. 282090 * GG: 1482763 * |
| 22 |
* JID:kali@××××××.pl * Tlen:pitkali@××××.pl * |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
Archives