| 1 |
> Indeed - this is why you can't really compare your experience with the once I |
| 2 |
> posted. He may well have been using rubbish hardware - but even if he wasn't, |
| 3 |
> the case remains this shows a vast improvement from cyrus over courier using |
| 4 |
> the same hardware. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I can! My mail server is a piece of crap! :) (Athlon t-bird, 1ghz, 512mb |
| 8 |
RAM, 60gb 7200rpm IDE disk) |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I'm using courier on it, and the box was seeing 3000-5000 messages a day |
| 11 |
(mostly spam, thanks to a user that insisted on using wildcard email |
| 12 |
addresses.. bleah) and was doing ok. |
| 13 |
I have several folders that each have over 10,000 messages and the |
| 14 |
respond just fine with courier. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Squirrelmail can get through them ok too. the turck-mmcache |
| 17 |
(e-accelerator now) helped out quite a bit. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Overall, I'd say that it depends on your situation and mail volume. I |
| 20 |
have been very happy with courier. It's been stable and has never given |
| 21 |
me any trouble. |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
Archives