Archives
Archives
| From: | Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-server@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-server] Caching Proxy alternative to Squid? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:05:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | 201106010917.31600.bangert@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-server] Caching Proxy alternative to Squid? by Christian Kauhaus |
||
| 1 | On Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:54:20 PM Christian Kauhaus wrote: |
| 2 | > Am 31.05.2011 19:36, schrieb Pandu Poluan: |
| 3 | > > So, what can I do? |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > I would have a closer look at varnish. We use it in production on some |
| 6 | > heavy-traffic websites for years and it is fast and really dependable. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | varnish is a reverse proxy only - it looks like Pandu Poluan is looking for a |
| 9 | forward proxy... |
| 10 | |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > Regards |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | > Christian |