Archives
Archives
| From: | Christian Kauhaus <kc@××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-server@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-server] Caching Proxy alternative to Squid? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 31 May 2011 21:04:39 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4DE5557C.8090106@gocept.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-server] Caching Proxy alternative to Squid? by Pandu Poluan |
||
| 1 | Am 31.05.2011 19:36, schrieb Pandu Poluan: |
| 2 | > So, what can I do? |
| 3 | |
| 4 | I would have a closer look at varnish. We use it in production on some |
| 5 | heavy-traffic websites for years and it is fast and really dependable. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Regards |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Christian |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Dipl.-Inf. Christian Kauhaus <>< · kc@××××××.com · systems administration |
| 13 | gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany |
| 14 | http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 11 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 |
| 15 | Zope and Plone consulting and development |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-server] Caching Proxy alternative to Squid? | Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o> |