1 |
Alex Efros schrieb: |
2 |
> Hi! |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 01:53:05PM +0100, Christian Bricart wrote: |
5 |
>> Drawbacks: |
6 |
>> according to FHS /usr may be a remote filesystem, but /etc/localtime has |
7 |
>> to exist during boot. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Can anybody in _this_ maillist confirm importance of "remote /usr" support? |
10 |
|
11 |
quoting from http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#THEUSRHIERARCHY |
12 |
[..] |
13 |
/usr is the second major section of the filesystem. /usr is shareable, |
14 |
read-only data. That means that /usr should be shareable between various |
15 |
FHS-compliant hosts and must not be written to. Any information that is |
16 |
host-specific or varies with time is stored elsewhere. |
17 |
[..] |
18 |
|
19 |
Christian |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |