1 |
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 23:02 +0300, Alex Efros wrote: |
2 |
> Hi! |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 02:41:59PM -0500, Homer Parker wrote: |
5 |
> > quarantine that you can go through and look for false positives |
6 |
> |
7 |
> At first, normal mail will not be delivered timely, just because it will |
8 |
> be in quarantine, and usually people doesn't check quarantine even once |
9 |
> per day. |
10 |
|
11 |
Mine mails the lowest 100 scoring spams (I use the defaults of tag at |
12 |
5, quarantine at 10.. And the end user can adjust that how they see fit) |
13 |
in the quarantine daily, and the subscribers appreciate looking that |
14 |
over rather then not having a usable Inbox. (I do domain hosting) |
15 |
|
16 |
> At second, normal mail will be lost, because while checking quarantine and |
17 |
> looking for false positives some normal mail will not be detected, because |
18 |
> it's hard enough work and people do mistakes. |
19 |
|
20 |
As it will get lost in an Inbox full of spam.. Spamassassin quarantines |
21 |
2500-3000 spams a week on one of my accounts, I'd lose lots of legit |
22 |
email if that was in my Inbox... That said, I don't remember digging one |
23 |
out of the quarantine in a very long time, I do get some forwarded jokes |
24 |
tagged because it's been forwarded 10 times or something.. I can live |
25 |
with that.. |
26 |
|
27 |
> And last, if I will check quarantine every few hours, I'll handle not so |
28 |
> much spam messages and chances are I'll not delete normal mail by mistake. |
29 |
> Yeah. But, in this case, what's the difference between using tools like |
30 |
> SpamAssassin and not using these tools at all and still handling all these |
31 |
> spam mail every few hours inside "inbox" instead of "quarantine"? |
32 |
|
33 |
In my case it's a usable Inbox vs 2500-3000 spams a week clogging it |
34 |
up.. Spamassassin isn't a fire and forget piece of software.. You need |
35 |
to train bayes, keep rules updated, write rules, etc... I hear |
36 |
bogofilter is decent as well, might look into it.. But there's no way I |
37 |
could handle using email without filtering to a quarantine.. |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Homer Parker <hparker@g.o> |