| 1 |
Hi! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 02:41:59PM -0500, Homer Parker wrote: |
| 4 |
> quarantine that you can go through and look for false positives |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
At first, normal mail will not be delivered timely, just because it will |
| 7 |
be in quarantine, and usually people doesn't check quarantine even once |
| 8 |
per day. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
At second, normal mail will be lost, because while checking quarantine and |
| 11 |
looking for false positives some normal mail will not be detected, because |
| 12 |
it's hard enough work and people do mistakes. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
And last, if I will check quarantine every few hours, I'll handle not so |
| 15 |
much spam messages and chances are I'll not delete normal mail by mistake. |
| 16 |
Yeah. But, in this case, what's the difference between using tools like |
| 17 |
SpamAssassin and not using these tools at all and still handling all these |
| 18 |
spam mail every few hours inside "inbox" instead of "quarantine"? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
WBR, Alex. |
Archives