Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: "James M. Cook" <jcook@××××.com>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Network Monitoring Packages eg:ntop
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:39:21
Message-Id: 200512221136.18818.jcook@iw-t.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-server] Network Monitoring Packages eg:ntop by Ow Mun Heng
1 On Thursday 22 December 2005 8:41 am, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
2 > Hi All,
3 >
4 > Just want to see if anyone has any good info to share.
5 >
6 > What I want: (not necessary host availability/polling)
7 >
8 > Network monitoring/network traffic analyser which is something like ntop
9 > which shows IP traffic in (from where) and out (to where) as well as top
10 > talkers, top ports etc. This is basically to determine whats happening
11 > with my network and who's been hogging the bandwidth etc. (time for some
12 > wrist slapping!!)
13 >
14 > And preferably it logs into a Mysql/Postgressql database which can be
15 > later dissected for analysis.
16 >
17 > I've looked at opennms - http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51441
18 > which seems to be able to do it.
19 >
20 > I've also looked at jffnms, (which used to be in portage? searched
21 > through the archives and it seems it was previously) but it seems to
22 > only be able to look at host/server availability.
23 >
24 > Looked at argus, it seems to have the features for Traffic Flow Analysis
25 > but it does not support (AFAICT) for logging into a DB.(The FAQ states
26 > answer is coming)
27 >
28 > Zabbix is another package but seems like it too provides for
29 > client/server availability etc. Doesn't do much for my needs.
30 >
31 > I initially looked at ntop, then found out that it no longer uses a SQL
32 > database for it's backend data collection, it now uses rrdtool. I've got
33 > some stupid question, I understand that RRDtool is a good thing since
34 > it's like a never growing DB, but frankly, just how many days/years of
35 > data can it hold? What's the limit etc? I don't seem to be able to
36 > locate a FAQ about that one particular point.
37 >
38 > Appreciate some comments.
39 >
40 > Thanks
41 >
42
43 I've evaluated all the packages you've listed but had completely forgotten
44 about ntop (which I'm playing with now, fantastic). I'm not sure any of them
45 are going to give you what you want.
46 I didn't see any information about Traffic Flow Analysis on argus' website, do
47 you have that URL?
48 Here's what I found for each:
49 opennms - nice, but uses tomcat since it's java based. Seemed to generate the
50 heaviest load on the server. Not knowing a whole lot about tomcat and using
51 tomcat4, which is not available in portage, made setup a little tricky for
52 me. Didn't see any graphing capabilities either.
53
54 jffnms - this was my choice for a while. Then I tried to add a new OID and
55 couldn't figure it out. I found the montoring interface was good but you
56 cannot reliably use the back button. The admin interface is a little
57 confusing. Documentation is sparse in many areas and development appears to
58 have stopped.
59
60 argus - this is my new choice. I like the simple web interface and the
61 configuration is pretty straightforward. I'm actually creating a script to
62 convert my old monitoring sw config to argus. Working at an ASP requires
63 monitoring website performance which appears to be the most straightforward
64 with argus. The graphs aren't as good as some other packages.
65
66 zabbix - I liked the newer version of this software looks (I think 1.1b2 was
67 the version) with it's revamped web frontend. I didn't care for installing
68 remote agents on all my servers and administration seemed confusing to me.
69
70 I've also tried midas (which appears to be dead and similar to zabbix) and
71 cacti with the threshold plugin. I really like cacti but didn't care for the
72 threshold plugin. It felt like NMS functionality was being bolted on top of
73 cacti. It works but not for my purposes.
74
75 It seems to me that none of these packages are perfect fits. For me argus
76 seems have come the closest. My main issue is there is not web interface to
77 update the config which is available in most of the others. This should only
78 become an issue when I start to have others maintain the system. :)
79
80 In the end I'll probably end up using a few pieces of software to address my
81 monitoring needs.
82
83 James
84
85 --
86 gentoo-server@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-server] Network Monitoring Packages eg:ntop Wayne Doyle <wayne.doyle@××××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-server] Network Monitoring Packages eg:ntop Ow Mun Heng <Ow.Mun.Heng@×××.com>