1 |
On Thursday 22 December 2005 8:41 am, Ow Mun Heng wrote: |
2 |
> Hi All, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Just want to see if anyone has any good info to share. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> What I want: (not necessary host availability/polling) |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Network monitoring/network traffic analyser which is something like ntop |
9 |
> which shows IP traffic in (from where) and out (to where) as well as top |
10 |
> talkers, top ports etc. This is basically to determine whats happening |
11 |
> with my network and who's been hogging the bandwidth etc. (time for some |
12 |
> wrist slapping!!) |
13 |
> |
14 |
> And preferably it logs into a Mysql/Postgressql database which can be |
15 |
> later dissected for analysis. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I've looked at opennms - http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51441 |
18 |
> which seems to be able to do it. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I've also looked at jffnms, (which used to be in portage? searched |
21 |
> through the archives and it seems it was previously) but it seems to |
22 |
> only be able to look at host/server availability. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Looked at argus, it seems to have the features for Traffic Flow Analysis |
25 |
> but it does not support (AFAICT) for logging into a DB.(The FAQ states |
26 |
> answer is coming) |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Zabbix is another package but seems like it too provides for |
29 |
> client/server availability etc. Doesn't do much for my needs. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I initially looked at ntop, then found out that it no longer uses a SQL |
32 |
> database for it's backend data collection, it now uses rrdtool. I've got |
33 |
> some stupid question, I understand that RRDtool is a good thing since |
34 |
> it's like a never growing DB, but frankly, just how many days/years of |
35 |
> data can it hold? What's the limit etc? I don't seem to be able to |
36 |
> locate a FAQ about that one particular point. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Appreciate some comments. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> Thanks |
41 |
> |
42 |
|
43 |
I've evaluated all the packages you've listed but had completely forgotten |
44 |
about ntop (which I'm playing with now, fantastic). I'm not sure any of them |
45 |
are going to give you what you want. |
46 |
I didn't see any information about Traffic Flow Analysis on argus' website, do |
47 |
you have that URL? |
48 |
Here's what I found for each: |
49 |
opennms - nice, but uses tomcat since it's java based. Seemed to generate the |
50 |
heaviest load on the server. Not knowing a whole lot about tomcat and using |
51 |
tomcat4, which is not available in portage, made setup a little tricky for |
52 |
me. Didn't see any graphing capabilities either. |
53 |
|
54 |
jffnms - this was my choice for a while. Then I tried to add a new OID and |
55 |
couldn't figure it out. I found the montoring interface was good but you |
56 |
cannot reliably use the back button. The admin interface is a little |
57 |
confusing. Documentation is sparse in many areas and development appears to |
58 |
have stopped. |
59 |
|
60 |
argus - this is my new choice. I like the simple web interface and the |
61 |
configuration is pretty straightforward. I'm actually creating a script to |
62 |
convert my old monitoring sw config to argus. Working at an ASP requires |
63 |
monitoring website performance which appears to be the most straightforward |
64 |
with argus. The graphs aren't as good as some other packages. |
65 |
|
66 |
zabbix - I liked the newer version of this software looks (I think 1.1b2 was |
67 |
the version) with it's revamped web frontend. I didn't care for installing |
68 |
remote agents on all my servers and administration seemed confusing to me. |
69 |
|
70 |
I've also tried midas (which appears to be dead and similar to zabbix) and |
71 |
cacti with the threshold plugin. I really like cacti but didn't care for the |
72 |
threshold plugin. It felt like NMS functionality was being bolted on top of |
73 |
cacti. It works but not for my purposes. |
74 |
|
75 |
It seems to me that none of these packages are perfect fits. For me argus |
76 |
seems have come the closest. My main issue is there is not web interface to |
77 |
update the config which is available in most of the others. This should only |
78 |
become an issue when I start to have others maintain the system. :) |
79 |
|
80 |
In the end I'll probably end up using a few pieces of software to address my |
81 |
monitoring needs. |
82 |
|
83 |
James |
84 |
|
85 |
-- |
86 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |