1 |
Hi Guys, |
2 |
|
3 |
Sounds like a job for ipaudit. |
4 |
http://ipaudit.sourceforge.net/ipaudit-web/ |
5 |
|
6 |
I didn't like ipaudit-web so I just used ipaudit it has a rather neat |
7 |
direct dump into mysql. |
8 |
well worth considering. |
9 |
|
10 |
Wayne |
11 |
|
12 |
James M. Cook wrote: |
13 |
|
14 |
>On Thursday 22 December 2005 8:41 am, Ow Mun Heng wrote: |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
>>Hi All, |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>>Just want to see if anyone has any good info to share. |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>>What I want: (not necessary host availability/polling) |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>>Network monitoring/network traffic analyser which is something like ntop |
24 |
>>which shows IP traffic in (from where) and out (to where) as well as top |
25 |
>>talkers, top ports etc. This is basically to determine whats happening |
26 |
>>with my network and who's been hogging the bandwidth etc. (time for some |
27 |
>>wrist slapping!!) |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>>And preferably it logs into a Mysql/Postgressql database which can be |
30 |
>>later dissected for analysis. |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>>I've looked at opennms - http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51441 |
33 |
>>which seems to be able to do it. |
34 |
>> |
35 |
>>I've also looked at jffnms, (which used to be in portage? searched |
36 |
>>through the archives and it seems it was previously) but it seems to |
37 |
>>only be able to look at host/server availability. |
38 |
>> |
39 |
>>Looked at argus, it seems to have the features for Traffic Flow Analysis |
40 |
>>but it does not support (AFAICT) for logging into a DB.(The FAQ states |
41 |
>>answer is coming) |
42 |
>> |
43 |
>>Zabbix is another package but seems like it too provides for |
44 |
>>client/server availability etc. Doesn't do much for my needs. |
45 |
>> |
46 |
>>I initially looked at ntop, then found out that it no longer uses a SQL |
47 |
>>database for it's backend data collection, it now uses rrdtool. I've got |
48 |
>>some stupid question, I understand that RRDtool is a good thing since |
49 |
>>it's like a never growing DB, but frankly, just how many days/years of |
50 |
>>data can it hold? What's the limit etc? I don't seem to be able to |
51 |
>>locate a FAQ about that one particular point. |
52 |
>> |
53 |
>>Appreciate some comments. |
54 |
>> |
55 |
>>Thanks |
56 |
>> |
57 |
>> |
58 |
>> |
59 |
> |
60 |
>I've evaluated all the packages you've listed but had completely forgotten |
61 |
>about ntop (which I'm playing with now, fantastic). I'm not sure any of them |
62 |
>are going to give you what you want. |
63 |
>I didn't see any information about Traffic Flow Analysis on argus' website, do |
64 |
>you have that URL? |
65 |
>Here's what I found for each: |
66 |
>opennms - nice, but uses tomcat since it's java based. Seemed to generate the |
67 |
>heaviest load on the server. Not knowing a whole lot about tomcat and using |
68 |
>tomcat4, which is not available in portage, made setup a little tricky for |
69 |
>me. Didn't see any graphing capabilities either. |
70 |
> |
71 |
>jffnms - this was my choice for a while. Then I tried to add a new OID and |
72 |
>couldn't figure it out. I found the montoring interface was good but you |
73 |
>cannot reliably use the back button. The admin interface is a little |
74 |
>confusing. Documentation is sparse in many areas and development appears to |
75 |
>have stopped. |
76 |
> |
77 |
>argus - this is my new choice. I like the simple web interface and the |
78 |
>configuration is pretty straightforward. I'm actually creating a script to |
79 |
>convert my old monitoring sw config to argus. Working at an ASP requires |
80 |
>monitoring website performance which appears to be the most straightforward |
81 |
>with argus. The graphs aren't as good as some other packages. |
82 |
> |
83 |
>zabbix - I liked the newer version of this software looks (I think 1.1b2 was |
84 |
>the version) with it's revamped web frontend. I didn't care for installing |
85 |
>remote agents on all my servers and administration seemed confusing to me. |
86 |
> |
87 |
>I've also tried midas (which appears to be dead and similar to zabbix) and |
88 |
>cacti with the threshold plugin. I really like cacti but didn't care for the |
89 |
>threshold plugin. It felt like NMS functionality was being bolted on top of |
90 |
>cacti. It works but not for my purposes. |
91 |
> |
92 |
>It seems to me that none of these packages are perfect fits. For me argus |
93 |
>seems have come the closest. My main issue is there is not web interface to |
94 |
>update the config which is available in most of the others. This should only |
95 |
>become an issue when I start to have others maintain the system. :) |
96 |
> |
97 |
>In the end I'll probably end up using a few pieces of software to address my |
98 |
>monitoring needs. |
99 |
> |
100 |
>James |
101 |
> |
102 |
> |
103 |
> |
104 |
|
105 |
-- |
106 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |