| 1 |
On Saturday 04 September 2004 5:00 pm, Zrubecz Laszlo wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2004-09-04, szo keltezéssel 13:14-kor Christian Parpart ezt írta: |
| 3 |
> > Wildcarding doesn't really help right here, because the vhosts are not |
| 4 |
> > all under the same domain, so, not a general solution here :( |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> In this case you can't run more then one virtualhost with the same |
| 7 |
> listening address. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> What you can do: |
| 10 |
> - use IP besed virtual hosts |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
That's to bad, I've just one IP, and more IPs cost money I do not have ;( |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> - use different listening port for virtualhosts |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
That's an idea, however, I do not prefer this, as it's not really intuitive. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I'm still wondering about the technical side, AS I do not understand *why* the |
| 19 |
web server can just serve one webserver certificate per (IP:PORT) pair. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
If someone usefull bookmark for me, I'd be pleased to read on them :) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Although, Apache, shall complain if this violates some https-design - as it |
| 24 |
obviousely doesn't. The only thing he is complaining is about not matching |
| 25 |
CN's when they REALLY ARE different to current <VirtualHost> context. |
| 26 |
So now, it didn't. Strange. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Regards, |
| 29 |
Christian Parpart. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
19:28:37 up 14 days, 7:08, 3 users, load average: 2.41, 2.17, 1.40 |
Archives