| 1 |
Top-posting corrected. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 8/17/05, *A. Khattri* <ajai@××××.net <mailto:ajai@××××.net>> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Ian P. Christian wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > On Tuesday 16 August 2005 13:01, Darko Luketic wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > and imho thats not really the way it should be, apache should |
| 9 |
> be restarted |
| 10 |
> > > once a day not potentially every 15 minutes. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > I don't see why it should be restarted at all. If you're not |
| 13 |
> binding to any |
| 14 |
> > new ports, a reload should be fine rather then a restart. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Just curious: would "apachectl graceful" load new vhosts added |
| 17 |
> since the |
| 18 |
> last restart? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> -- |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> gentoo-server@g.o <mailto:gentoo-server@g.o> mailing |
| 25 |
> list |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Michael Crute wrote: |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> The gaceful command will actually cause apache to restart but only |
| 30 |
> after all pending transfers complete. I believe that this is the |
| 31 |
> default behavior of /etc/init.d/apache2 restart the command you are |
| 32 |
> looking for is reload. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
No, that's definitely NOT what he is after - since you are adding new |
| 35 |
vhosts these will never be involved in any ongoing transfers. |
| 36 |
Instead, reload will break off all current transfers - not a good idea |
| 37 |
on a heavily loaded server. |
| 38 |
Graceful is fine. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
Archives