1 |
> Top-posting corrected. |
2 |
> |
3 |
>> On 8/17/05, *A. Khattri* <ajai@××××.net <mailto:ajai@××××.net>> wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Ian P. Christian wrote: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> > On Tuesday 16 August 2005 13:01, Darko Luketic wrote: |
8 |
>> > > and imho thats not really the way it should be, apache should |
9 |
>> be restarted |
10 |
>> > > once a day not potentially every 15 minutes. |
11 |
>> > |
12 |
>> > I don't see why it should be restarted at all. If you're not |
13 |
>> binding to any |
14 |
>> > new ports, a reload should be fine rather then a restart. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> Just curious: would "apachectl graceful" load new vhosts added |
17 |
>> since the |
18 |
>> last restart? |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> -- |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> -- |
24 |
>> gentoo-server@g.o <mailto:gentoo-server@g.o> mailing |
25 |
>> list |
26 |
>> |
27 |
>> Michael Crute wrote: |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> The gaceful command will actually cause apache to restart but only |
30 |
>> after all pending transfers complete. I believe that this is the |
31 |
>> default behavior of /etc/init.d/apache2 restart the command you are |
32 |
>> looking for is reload. |
33 |
>> |
34 |
> No, that's definitely NOT what he is after - since you are adding new |
35 |
> vhosts these will never be involved in any ongoing transfers. |
36 |
> Instead, reload will break off all current transfers - not a good idea |
37 |
> on a heavily loaded server. |
38 |
> Graceful is fine. |
39 |
|
40 |
what about just calling: |
41 |
|
42 |
# killall -HUP apache2 |
43 |
|
44 |
this will cause the httpd to reload it's config, not? |
45 |
|
46 |
Christian |
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |