Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: stephen white <steve@×××××××××××××××.au>
To: gentoo-server@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] status update
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 04:33:59
Message-Id: 7DC5131A-D2C7-11D7-8E01-000393B7D972@cs.adelaide.edu.au
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-server] status update by Kurt Lieber
1 On Wednesday, August 20, 2003, at 02:26 AM, Kurt Lieber wrote:
2 > The reason we've ruled out DHCP so far is because not all networks run
3 > DHCP
4 > or want to run DHCP.
5
6 I don't understand this reasoning, as this is like saying "not all
7 networks run zeroconf or want to run zeroconf"... DHCP is just a
8 program, and the gold server can run whatever programs it wants. The
9 network sits there and passes the packets.
10
11 --
12 steve@×××××××××××××××.au
13
14 CRICOS Provider Number 00123M
15 ------------------------------------------------
16 This email message is intended only for the addressee(s)
17 and contains information that may be confidential and/or
18 copyright. If you are not the intended recipient please
19 notify the sender by reply email and immediately delete
20 this email. Use, disclosure or reproduction of this email
21 by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly
22 prohibited. No representation is made that this email or
23 any attachments are free of viruses. Virus scanning is
24 recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-server] status update Vegard Figenschou <vegard.figenschou@×××××××××××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-server] status update tigger@g.o
Re: [gentoo-server] status update Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o>