Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: "Sancho2k.net Lists" <lists@××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] mysql 4.1 status
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 01:29:34
Message-Id: 42815FFD.70701@sancho2k.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-server] mysql 4.1 status by Lance Albertson
1 Lance Albertson wrote:
2 > Ben Munat wrote:
3 >
4 >
5 >>Anyone know what's taking so long to get MySQL 4.1 unmasked? I'm getting
6 >>a lot of guff about how 4.1 has been available for over a year and it's
7 >>the latest *stable* version version at the MySQL site. I appreciate the
8 >>fact that the devs want to make sure it's extra, extra stable, but even
9 >>just a rough guess when it will be ready would help. Maybe there's a dev
10 >>lurking nearby??
11 >
12 >
13 > The main mysql dev has been dealing with a lot of real-life issues (school,
14 > exams, etc) and hasn't had the appropriate time to make this work. However, he
15 > does have someone he wants to bring on board to help take care of mysql and has
16 > been doing a great job so far. I've been following bug 83011 as things get
17 > closer to getting into portage.
18 >
19 > About the unmasking... I'm not sure, 4.1 introduces a lot of migration headache
20 > so the transition will need to have some kind of sane flow. I'm not the person
21 > to really comment on that!
22
23 Yes, consider the new dependencies for the DBD-mysql module, as well as
24 the fact that several other applications in Portage just Don't Work with
25 4.1.x and later. Sometimes with Portage, it's a lot harder than just
26 getting an updated ebuild. You have to consider the effect it has on
27 Portage as a whole.
28
29 Gentoo devs: is there any more specific testing that users can do to help?
30
31 DS
32 --
33 gentoo-server@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-server] mysql 4.1 status dormando <dormando@×××××.net>