| 1 |
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:36:27 -0400 |
| 2 |
Andy Dustman <farcepest@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Personally I think the letter codes you get are not so good: |
| 5 |
> Intuitively, [N] means "no" but it really means "might be affected". |
| 6 |
> I'd prefer something like: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> [ ] means this GLSA was already applied, |
| 9 |
> [-] means the system is not affected and |
| 10 |
> [X] indicates that the system might be affected. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
That's not really hard to achieve, I've attached you a patch for it. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Maybe you want to propose your change to the maintainer, metadata.xml |
| 15 |
states that karltk@g.o is responsible for gentoolkit. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Regards, |
| 18 |
Michael |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
www.cargal.org |
| 22 |
GnuPG-key-ID: 0x90CA09E3 |
| 23 |
Jabber-ID: citizen428 [at] cargal [dot] org |
| 24 |
Registered Linux User #278726 |
Archives