| 1 |
On 04/23/2013 11:46 AM, Ryuichi KAWAMATA wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> My name is Ryuichi KAWAMATAl(in japanese "川又 龍一") |
| 5 |
> In IRC, my name is "rkmathi." |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Nice to meet you |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> I want to submit proposal to GSoC 2013 "webapp-config" |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I checked up how to write proposal and wrote it. |
| 12 |
> Could you check my proposal and give something advise? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Next is my proposal. |
| 15 |
> --- |
| 16 |
> - Abstract |
| 17 |
> It can maintain many web applications which is made from PHP and |
| 18 |
> something, but it cannot maintain recently commonly-used applications. |
| 19 |
> So, I want to implement "webapp-config for Ruby applications"[1] for |
| 20 |
> conveniently. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> - Objective |
| 23 |
> Webapp-config can use many web applications which is made from PHP and |
| 24 |
> something, but it cannot use web applications which is implemented by |
| 25 |
> Ruby. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Nothing prevents the current webapp-config to support non-php |
| 28 |
applications as it is. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> So, I will implement this. |
| 31 |
> In particular, I will implement to use Redmine[2] 1.4.x, 2.2.x, 2.3.x, |
| 32 |
> and GitLab[3] 5.x. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
I'd rather have webapp-config enhanced to provide deployment |
| 35 |
configurations for any rack application, possibly targeting uwsgi and |
| 36 |
passenger. redmine and gitlab are good sample cases but I doubt it |
| 37 |
should take that much time to craft a webapp-config compatible ebuild |
| 38 |
for them. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
lu |
Archives