Archives
Archives
| From: | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-soc@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-soc] libbash Weekly Update | ||
| Date: | Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:40:17 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4C47232F.1050803@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-soc] libbash Weekly Update by Luca Barbato |
||
| 1 | On 07/21/2010 06:59 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > Anyway it's not so related to the project at hand. Still I wonder why |
| 5 | > not using a quick language (e.g. ruby, python) for this project if the |
| 6 | > aim is to have a prototype. C and C++ are useful if you plan to optimize |
| 7 | > a lot. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Anltr has two mature backends as far as I know: C and Java. My guess is |
| 11 | that most of the people wouldn't approve the latter. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Regards, |
| 14 | Petteri |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-soc] libbash Weekly Update | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> |