Gentoo Archives: gentoo-soc

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] libbash Weekly Update
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:56:29
Message-Id: 20100721165547.GH18042@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-soc] libbash Weekly Update by "Petteri Räty"
1 On 21-07-2010 19:41:19 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
2 > On 07/21/2010 06:59 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
3 > > Anyway it's not so related to the project at hand. Still I wonder why
4 > > not using a quick language (e.g. ruby, python) for this project if the
5 > > aim is to have a prototype. C and C++ are useful if you plan to optimize
6 > > a lot.
7 >
8 > Anltr has two mature backends as far as I know: C and Java. My guess is
9 > that most of the people wouldn't approve the latter.
10
11 If you're prototyping anyway, I prefer Java over Python or Ruby, since
12 Java is much more close to C in semantics.
13
14
15 --
16 Fabian Groffen
17 Gentoo on a different level

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-soc] libbash Weekly Update "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>