Gentoo Archives: gentoo-soc

From: Ashwin Kumar <ashwinkumar3098@×××××.com>
To: Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Weekly Report: Project - Standalone Gentoo Chromebook
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 08:46:39
Message-Id: CAP0gjOW9F0hMELG3Wyp+y_dauWhavTJG=DoC9PJ=7aKd-YXkoQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-soc] Weekly Report: Project - Standalone Gentoo Chromebook by Benda Xu
1 > Does the resulting cross toolchain work for you?
2 Yes, It is.
3
4 > On CrOS we are building natively, why a cross toolchain is needed?
5 I have just changed the vendor name. Architecture, OS and C Libraries are
6 the same
7
8 On Wed, 1 Jul 2020, 13:54 Benda Xu, <heroxbd@g.o> wrote:
9
10 > Ashwin Kumar <ashwinkumar3098@×××××.com> writes:
11 >
12 > >> What prevents you from using Gentoo native toolchain binary package?
13 > > When I tried to emerge binary package, crOS was missing make and patch
14 > > which again puts in circular dependencies.
15 >
16 > No, Gentoo binary packages do not need make and patch. Please study:
17 >
18 > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Binary_package_guide
19 >
20 > >> Why is crosstool necessary?
21 >
22 > > Crosstool-ng produces toolchain directory and can just be moved to
23 > > crOS (easier than building packages individually)
24 >
25 > Does the resulting cross toolchain work for you?
26 >
27 > On CrOS we are building natively, why a cross toolchain is needed?
28 >
29 > Benda
30 >