| 1 |
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 04:35:20PM +0800, Benda Xu wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> You are not answering my question. My original comment was only on the |
| 5 |
> severe issue of hipcc 'isystem'. Although you mentioned "I came to a |
| 6 |
> new hipvars.pm and a patch to hipcc.pl, disabling poisoning `-isystem` |
| 7 |
> and correcting many paths", I cannot see any fix pushed into ::gentoo. |
| 8 |
> Otherwise we won't be bitten by bug 853184. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The statement "I came to a new hipvars.pm and a patch to hipcc.pl, |
| 11 |
disabling poisoning `-isystem`" describes the situation in packaging |
| 12 |
dev-util/hip-5.1.3 against vanilla llvm/clang on my own development |
| 13 |
branch, and it is independent of ug 853184 (they may share some |
| 14 |
similarities, but at that time I didn't realize there can be bug in |
| 15 |
hip-5.0.2). Bug 853184 is introduced by https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/25861. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I am sorry for pusin dev-util/hip-5.0.2-r1 without test it's functionality. |
| 18 |
I'll go back to the 5.0.2 branch and fix up the mess, and setup a CI |
| 19 |
system to provide solid testings. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> This is a situation you should avoid at all cost in the future. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
Archives