Gentoo Archives: gentoo-soc

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Framework for automated ebuild generators: final report
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:44:21
Message-Id: CAGfcS_nWTA1PA0bf22h1Ndu-cTxnUwHPLEX2F_=cwE_KM5_=og@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-soc] Framework for automated ebuild generators: final report by Brian Dolbec
1 On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > And what's so hard about:
4 >
5 > echo "=app-portage/layman **" >> /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords
6 > emerge layman
7 >
8 > and for easier live ebuild updates:
9 >
10 > emerge app-portage/smart-live-rebuild
11
12 There is nothing "hard" about running live ebuilds - they can simply
13 never be unmasked, and there is no QA whatsoever. Smart-live-rebuild
14 just means that if you have a live package that does happen to work
15 the first commit that introduces a regression breaks it. :)
16
17 Nothing wrong with having to depend on something live for something
18 cutting-edge. However, it really isn't in a usable state until that
19 changes. It will get there eventually.
20
21 Looking forward to getting rid of g-cpan whenever this becomes stable...
22
23 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-soc] Framework for automated ebuild generators: final report Jauhien Piatlicki <jpiatlicki@×××××.com>