1 |
> |
2 |
> There's some pitfalls for students in writing something like Ebuild |
3 |
> Generator. Understanding the needs of the users goes a long a way |
4 |
> towards making a project successful. It can be quite hard to step into |
5 |
> the shoes of someone who has written ebuilds for many years if you have |
6 |
> no experience in ebuild writing. At least an involved mentor is needed. |
7 |
> Not impossible of course but the application would need to detail how |
8 |
> the generator will work to clearly show that there's benefit in writing one. |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
This actually makes perfect sense. It may prove to be a difficult task since |
12 |
I have very little experience with Gentoo. |
13 |
|
14 |
On a completely unrelated note, today I discovered quick-init |
15 |
(http://www.obliquo.net/?articles/quick-init.html) which modifies the |
16 |
boot sequence |
17 |
to speed it up. This application does not target Gentoo. It was |
18 |
specifically written for |
19 |
Arch Linux, which I am running alongside Gentoo. I was curious to see |
20 |
what results |
21 |
would be achieved and I was pleasantly surprised: |
22 |
Using the default kernel, I measured boot time using bootchart, which |
23 |
announced 40s |
24 |
to get from GRUB to tty and type 'startx' (which started X with the |
25 |
OpenBox WM - no |
26 |
fancy KDE/Gnome). |
27 |
After installing the above mentioned application, I redid the measure, |
28 |
only to discover |
29 |
I was down to 15s ! (Test machine is a netbook with a regular HDD). I |
30 |
checked Arch's |
31 |
forums and it seems several people get these results although there |
32 |
are some problems. |
33 |
|
34 |
This made me think of the project to reduce boot times that is the |
35 |
wiki page, and as such |
36 |
I wonder if it would be a good idea to adapt the application for |
37 |
Gentoo, and fix known issues. |
38 |
|
39 |
I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this. |
40 |
|
41 |
Regards, |
42 |
|
43 |
Marios |