| 1 |
ÓÚ 2011/6/28 10:21, Donnie Berkholz дµÀ: |
| 2 |
> On 10:13 Tue 28 Jun , Mu Qiao wrote: |
| 3 |
>> ÓÚ 2011/6/27 20:53, Donnie Berkholz дµÀ: |
| 4 |
>>> I've really been enjoying seeing the numbers of ebuilds your code |
| 5 |
>>> can handle going up each week. What did it change to over the past |
| 6 |
>>> week? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Thanks for pointing out. We can handle 7800 ebuilds now. It hasn't |
| 9 |
>> been changed for weeks because we are stuck with some limitations from |
| 10 |
>> the parser grammar. Some important eclasses(like eutils.eclass) cannot |
| 11 |
>> be fully parsed so any ebuild that inherits from those eclasses will |
| 12 |
>> fail. I don't think we can handle more ebuilds until we solve the |
| 13 |
>> problem with semantic predicate. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Good to hear what the hold-up is. It was 8028 last week, did it regress? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Yes it regressed a bit. Actually the result is not quite stable but it |
| 19 |
should be around 8000 (That probably is the number of ebuilds that don't |
| 20 |
inherit the eclasses we cannot handle). I expect a big change after we |
| 21 |
fix the parser grammar :) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Cheers, |
| 25 |
Mu Qiao |
| 26 |
GnuPG fingerprint: 92B1 B0C4 8D14 F8C4 EFA5 3ACC 30B3 0DE4 17B1 57E9 |
Archives