Gentoo Archives: gentoo-soc

From: Nathan Eloe <powerofazure@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Weekly progress report: libbash
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:00:18
Message-Id: 4C335EC7.3050402@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-soc] Weekly progress report: libbash by Auke Booij
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 7/6/10 11:38 AM, Auke Booij wrote:
5 > eh, wut? 50 fail to parse, but 50 parse correctly? what about the other 26900?
6 >
7 > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Nathan Eloe <powerofazure@×××××.com> wrote:
8 > Not a whole lot to say from this end, really. There's been a lot of
9 > progress, but it all gets summed up in the following statement:
10 >
11 > As of right now, less than 50 ebuilds in the portage tree fail to parse.
12 >
13 > That's right, out of the over 27,000 ebuilds in the tree, less than 50
14 > parse correctly.
15 >
16 > This week I'm working on trying to get those last few to build. It all
17 > boils down to three or so problems, but we're getting there.
18
19 Wow, let me try this again.
20 The first statement is correct. I missed the "fail to" in the second
21 one. My apologies for the confusion.
22
23 I'm working on getting those last few to parse correctly. The majority
24 of them work.
25
26 Thank you for catching that.
27
28 Nate
29 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
31 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
32
33 iEYEARECAAYFAkwzXscACgkQFpoRlVgtqKa+pwCdFxcVSDjYWd07pQBudp5HMnPP
34 DX4AnAlU6vaX+AGHdQVYLyM8n0Qa4tJ0
35 =pXR/
36 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----