Gentoo Archives: gentoo-soc

From: Auke Booij <auke@××××××.com>
To: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Weekly progress report: libbash
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:38:54
Message-Id: AANLkTilRuLrLnBw05iqRr_wV_ywYDetJVKciu-gOD12X@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-soc] Weekly progress report: libbash by Nathan Eloe
1 eh, wut? 50 fail to parse, but 50 parse correctly? what about the other 26900?
2
3 On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Nathan Eloe <powerofazure@×××××.com> wrote:
4 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
5 > Hash: SHA1
6 >
7 > Not a whole lot to say from this end, really. There's been a lot of
8 > progress, but it all gets summed up in the following statement:
9 >
10 > As of right now, less than 50 ebuilds in the portage tree fail to parse.
11 >
12 > That's right, out of the over 27,000 ebuilds in the tree, less than 50
13 > parse correctly.
14 >
15 > This week I'm working on trying to get those last few to build.  It all
16 > boils down to three or so problems, but we're getting there.
17 >
18 > Nate
19 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
21 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
22 >
23 > iEYEARECAAYFAkwzW44ACgkQFpoRlVgtqKYCnwCfToup8hEwTFfR8kUg81jfqHFM
24 > 7wcAn1n9REdQnuALGr2yI85r5+rjSTJJ
25 > =aPXP
26 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
27 >
28 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-soc] Weekly progress report: libbash Nathan Eloe <powerofazure@×××××.com>