Gentoo Archives: gentoo-soc

From: Antoine Pinsard <antoine.pinsard@×××××××××××.fr>
To: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Project Proposal : GenCC for "Gentoo Community Compiling"
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:50:17
Message-Id: 1361227922.18852.237.camel@Coffee
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-soc] Project Proposal : GenCC for "Gentoo Community Compiling" by Rich Freeman
1 Thanks for these precisions.
2
3 Binary repository seems to be a radical but good solution to get rid of
4 attack attempts (in both ways). However (though I'm sure you're aware of
5 that), compilation possibilities are much too numerous to consider
6 applying it. And that's Gentoo's reason of beeing. Well, I think.
7
8 After some more searching, it comes obvious that, while it would be a
9 very interesting project, I clearly don't have the skills to carry it
10 out. That's why I will let researchers do their job and find another
11 interesting project.
12
13 Nonetheless, I think I found a solution that would theoretically work:
14 using kind of a "Web of Trust" (as do OpenPGP).
15
16 On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 14:13 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
17 > I think the big question is - what does distributed compilation get us
18 > that a binary repository doesn't get us, or in what way is it easier?
19 > I can't really think of any advantages of the former over the latter.
20
21 I don't agree with you on that point. Though distributed compilation
22 doesn't seem to be applicable yet, I don't think a binary repository
23 will ever be applicable (for the reason I stated formerly).
24
25 Regards,
26
27 Antoine Pinsard

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies