| 1 |
Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: |
| 2 |
>>> Maybe you could include the installed portage systems (portage, pkgcore, |
| 3 |
>>> paludis) :) |
| 4 |
>> As of now it works with portage only .. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I don't mean work with it, but list it as especially interesting information |
| 7 |
> :) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Actually I had the same idea, too. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'm wondering if it should be done more in a generic way |
| 12 |
(as in top N for each category) or a selected way with hardcoded sets of |
| 13 |
packages to compare (selected package managers, selected audio players, |
| 14 |
selected text editors, ...) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Extending the report generation code can takes quite some time so I try |
| 17 |
to understand as much as possible about the report's future before I |
| 18 |
actually do changes to it. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I feel like we could use a "big vision" first to save me refactorings. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Sebastian |
Archives