1 |
No change in 9999, which is strange. Maybe i was wrong about the fix for |
2 |
gold. |
3 |
|
4 |
On 01/29/2016 07:55 PM, Alex McWhirter wrote: |
5 |
> On 01/29/2016 07:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
6 |
>> On 29 Jan 2016 19:28, Alex McWhirter wrote: |
7 |
>>> Regarding the issue with pcitutils, it is indeed and issue with gold. It |
8 |
>>> turns out udev is broken as well, as in it wont start. |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> binutils has supposedly fixed this issue upstream, i may try to emerge |
11 |
>>> 9999 later tonight. perhaps eudev fairs a bit better than udev? Would |
12 |
>>> there be any issue with moving to eudev as a default? |
13 |
>> arches should not be picking any defaults like udev. we should be using |
14 |
>> the same default across all linux systems. especially if the only point |
15 |
>> is to workaround a bug in gold. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> is the fix in binutils-2.26 ? that's going into the tree in a bit ... |
18 |
>> i'm waiting for some feedback from upstream before i push it. |
19 |
>> -mike |
20 |
> I can check to see if the fix is in .26, but eudev does work without |
21 |
> issue for what it's worth. pciutils is also compiling without issue with |
22 |
> eudev. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> I will try pulling 9999 and see if the issue is no longer there, if it's |
25 |
> been resolved there then ill check into .26 |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Without that fix, sparc64 is probably a no-go. I suppose we could always |
28 |
> patch .25 if needed. |
29 |
> |