| 1 |
On 02/01/2016 12:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 29 Jan 2016 19:55, Alex McWhirter wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 01/29/2016 07:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 29 Jan 2016 19:28, Alex McWhirter wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> Regarding the issue with pcitutils, it is indeed and issue with gold. It |
| 6 |
>>>> turns out udev is broken as well, as in it wont start. |
| 7 |
>>>> |
| 8 |
>>>> binutils has supposedly fixed this issue upstream, i may try to emerge |
| 9 |
>>>> 9999 later tonight. perhaps eudev fairs a bit better than udev? Would |
| 10 |
>>>> there be any issue with moving to eudev as a default? |
| 11 |
>>> arches should not be picking any defaults like udev. we should be using |
| 12 |
>>> the same default across all linux systems. especially if the only point |
| 13 |
>>> is to workaround a bug in gold. |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> is the fix in binutils-2.26 ? that's going into the tree in a bit ... |
| 16 |
>>> i'm waiting for some feedback from upstream before i push it. |
| 17 |
>> I can check to see if the fix is in .26, but eudev does work without |
| 18 |
>> issue for what it's worth. pciutils is also compiling without issue with |
| 19 |
>> eudev. |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> I will try pulling 9999 and see if the issue is no longer there, if it's |
| 22 |
>> been resolved there then ill check into .26 |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> Without that fix, sparc64 is probably a no-go. I suppose we could always |
| 25 |
>> patch .25 if needed. |
| 26 |
> why ? as i said, gold is not the default, and we don't hold up issues |
| 27 |
> because of gold compatibility. if sparc64 w/ld.bfd works fine, then |
| 28 |
> that's all we need. |
| 29 |
> -mike |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
It looks like udev is hard coded to use gold, i may have to hack around |
| 33 |
with configure.ac to get it to compile with bfd. |
Archives