| 1 |
Dnia 2013-09-08, o godz. 13:53:35 |
| 2 |
Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Hello, folks. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > The next systemd team meeting will be held at 10 Sep 2013, 18:30 UTC. |
| 8 |
> > That is, 30 minutes before the Council meeting, so people waiting for |
| 9 |
> > the meeting can come by. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Since there's no real interest in the meeting, I don't expect it to |
| 12 |
> > take long. Agenda follows: |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > 1. Vote for the new team lead. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > 2. Quick check on the state of systemd support. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > 3. Open floor. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Here's a topic: I would like to discuss ideas for dealing with |
| 22 |
> services that require a configured network connection. For reference, |
| 23 |
> see bug 483780 and 483970. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> NetworkManager has a optional unit that blocks until configured |
| 26 |
> interfaces are ready. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/tree/data/NetworkManager-wait-online.service.in |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> I wonder if we can/should provide similar functionality for other |
| 31 |
> network setups, or if anyone has a better idea. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Well, that would be the purpose of network-online.target (see: man |
| 34 |
systemd.special). Though I'm not sure if we can actually get it done for |
| 35 |
many of the other software out there. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Best regards, |
| 39 |
Michał Górny |
Archives