1 |
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 12:44 -0500, Deedra Waters wrote: |
2 |
> All, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I'd like to try and keep things moving on this issue. So far, I've only |
5 |
> seen swift, corey, and dostrow's comments on this. Any other feedback on |
6 |
> this would be greatly appreciated. I'd like to see this done with by the |
7 |
> end of this year, and i think it's taken long enough. So, my question |
8 |
> is, should we go with this? If so, how do we pitch this to the devs? |
9 |
> Reguardless of what we decide on, we're going to get oposision to this. |
10 |
> |
11 |
|
12 |
As far as I'm concerned opposition is 100% irrelevant. The job of the |
13 |
foundation is to protect the intellectual property of the Gentoo |
14 |
Project, the only way we can do this is to hold a copyright or joint |
15 |
royalty-free license on all pertinent works. We need to push this |
16 |
through ASAP. The text of the document addresses every concern except |
17 |
for the "I'm a minor and I can't sign it and my parents don't want to." |
18 |
concern. |
19 |
|
20 |
For all those who don't want to sign something because they feel that it |
21 |
is against the spirit of free software they don;t understand what is |
22 |
actually at stake. We are becoming more popular by the day and |
23 |
eventually we may have to defend something that is rightfully ours. As |
24 |
it stands we are on VERY soft ground if it were to happen tomorrow. |
25 |
Unfortunately I feel we have to take the position of signing it is |
26 |
mandatory for all those working on major gentoo-centric projects. For |
27 |
side projects and ebuilds we will just have to accept that some portion |
28 |
of them will not be protected under law. This is in large part OK since |
29 |
user submitted ebuilds et. al. will be under the same umbrella. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Daniel Ostrow |
33 |
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
34 |
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel} |
35 |
dostrow@g.o |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |