1 |
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr. |
2 |
<daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
> On March 17, 2012 at 10:57 PM "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com> |
7 |
> wrote: |
8 |
> |
9 |
>> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr. |
10 |
>> <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
11 |
>> > |
12 |
>> > |
13 |
>> > |
14 |
>> > On March 17, 2012 at 8:48 PM Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> |
15 |
> wrote: |
16 |
>> > |
17 |
>> >> On 17/03/12 13:53, Alan Mackenzie wrote: |
18 |
>> >> > Hello, Nikos. |
19 |
>> >> > |
20 |
>> >> > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 08:25:48AM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
21 |
>> >> > |
22 |
>> >> >>> Happy Computer Users, systemd is on your horizon. |
23 |
>> >> > |
24 |
>> >> >> No, we don't. I hope systemd arrives soon. It's the best init |
25 |
> system |
26 |
>> > I |
27 |
>> >> >> ever saw. |
28 |
>> >> > |
29 |
>> >> > What's so good about it? What will it do for me? |
30 |
>> >> > |
31 |
>> >> > I have this horrible sneaking suspicion that it will be more |
32 |
>> > complicated |
33 |
>> >> > than /sbin/init + OpenRC, just like udev + initramfs is more |
34 |
>> > complicated |
35 |
>> >> > than udev, and CUPS is more complicated than classical lpr. |
36 |
>> >> > |
37 |
>> >> > Why do you find it so good? |
38 |
>> >> |
39 |
>> >> No idea. I only posted this because the OP didn't say what's bad |
40 |
> about |
41 |
>> >> systemd :-) I really don't know I should care whether my system runs |
42 |
>> >> OpenRC or systemd. |
43 |
>> >> |
44 |
>> >> |
45 |
>> > |
46 |
>> > |
47 |
>> > I'm the OP, and often I don't know how to express myself. |
48 |
>> > |
49 |
>> > It is my understanding that systemd is going to force an initramfs on |
50 |
> you |
51 |
>> > even if you only have / and no other partitions. (Could it be initrd |
52 |
> and |
53 |
>> > not initramfs?) |
54 |
>> > |
55 |
>> > I'm all for automounting a device when it's plugged in, if that's what |
56 |
> the |
57 |
>> > user chooses. But for me, with my workstation, laptop, wife's PC and |
58 |
>> > daughter's laptop -- we just don't need or care for it. Seems a shame |
59 |
> to be |
60 |
>> > using udev and then have to completely change your system when 181 |
61 |
> comes |
62 |
>> > out, or freeze it at . |
63 |
>> > |
64 |
>> > Therefore, we don't install anything to automount devices. We have |
65 |
> lines |
66 |
>> > such as these in fstab: |
67 |
>> > |
68 |
>> > UUID=6C5F-3742 /Libby-Vivitar vfat |
69 |
>> > noauto,users,rw,gid=100,dmask=0002,fmask=0113 0 0 |
70 |
>> > |
71 |
>> > for those devices we own. When we get a new device, we add a new line. |
72 |
>> > |
73 |
>> > We don't use a DE either, just Fluxbox. |
74 |
>> > |
75 |
>> > The bottom line is that I don't like things being forced on me (hint, |
76 |
> "get |
77 |
>> > the vaseline, they're on the way!") And I don't like upstream forcing |
78 |
> such |
79 |
>> > nefarious changes on the distros. And for the Lennart fanboi, his |
80 |
> coding is |
81 |
>> > so questionable that "Lennartware" has become derogatory slang. (Of |
82 |
> course, |
83 |
>> > you already know that.) |
84 |
>> |
85 |
>> No need to get personal man, relax. |
86 |
> |
87 |
> I disagree ... there's every reason to get personal. Not getting personal |
88 |
> doesn't assign the blame. Men stand up and take responsibility for their |
89 |
> actions. |
90 |
|
91 |
You called me "Lennart fanboi". That wasn't personal? |
92 |
|
93 |
>> I'm getting my PhD in Computer Science |
94 |
> <snip> |
95 |
> |
96 |
> I got my PhD in life before your parents met. So what? Just saying... |
97 |
|
98 |
I'm not bragging; I just explained my credentials as to why I say that |
99 |
Lennart's code is actually quite good. Because I have actually studied |
100 |
it, besides tried it. Have you? And, are you gonna keep saying you are |
101 |
not getting personal, by the way? |
102 |
|
103 |
>> So again, please, [citation needed]. You still haven't provided any |
104 |
>> reference to support your claim that Lennart's code (specifically |
105 |
>> systemd's code) is "poorly" done. |
106 |
> |
107 |
> Mate, have you heard of the world wide web? The internet? |
108 |
|
109 |
And "the Internet" has always the same opinion. And it's never wrong. |
110 |
|
111 |
> Seriously, mate ... are you his boyfriend, on his payroll, related, or |
112 |
> what? |
113 |
|
114 |
No, I don't even know him. Are you gonna keep saying you are not |
115 |
getting personal, by the way? |
116 |
|
117 |
> You search LKML for yourself. I've been there since 2003 and have numerous |
118 |
> memories. |
119 |
|
120 |
Me too. Lennart has actually code accepted into the Linux Kernel, and |
121 |
he's a member of the Linux Kernel Plumbers. How's that as proof of |
122 |
the quality of his code? |
123 |
|
124 |
> How about: |
125 |
> http://www.change.org/petitions/lennart-poettering-stop-writing-useless-programs-systemd-journal |
126 |
|
127 |
Really? A petition on-line? With 235 votes? That's the best reference |
128 |
you can present? |
129 |
|
130 |
On one side, we have a guy whose code is included in all the levels on |
131 |
the stack, from kernel to end-user application. On the other, we have |
132 |
an open internet petition with 235 votes. |
133 |
|
134 |
Yeah, I'm gonna side with the on-line poll. |
135 |
|
136 |
> Sorry, mate ... many of us here are allergic to FUD <:-)} |
137 |
|
138 |
I would say that you are allergic to Lennart's work. But I'm pretty |
139 |
sure that you haven't take the time at least once to actually study it |
140 |
or at least try it, and given the level of discussion you present, I'm |
141 |
starting to think you don't actually have the capacity to study it. |
142 |
So, in that sense, the one spreading the FUD is you. |
143 |
|
144 |
All I keep saying is that I use systemd (and udev, and GNOME 3), and |
145 |
that I like it, and that I agree with the technical decisions behind |
146 |
it. |
147 |
|
148 |
That's it. Of course you don't have to agree with me (as I don't agree |
149 |
with you). But at least I'm not resort to name-calling, and I actually |
150 |
have tried (and studied) both systemd and OpenRC (which is the topic |
151 |
of this particular branch of the thread we are in). |
152 |
|
153 |
I'm out of this thread. As always, I give my opinion, do whatever you |
154 |
want with it. |
155 |
|
156 |
Regards. |
157 |
-- |
158 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
159 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
160 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |