1 |
On March 17, 2012 at 10:57 PM "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr. |
5 |
> <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > On March 17, 2012 at 8:48 PM Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> |
10 |
wrote: |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> >> On 17/03/12 13:53, Alan Mackenzie wrote: |
13 |
> >> > Hello, Nikos. |
14 |
> >> > |
15 |
> >> > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 08:25:48AM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
16 |
> >> > |
17 |
> >> >>> Happy Computer Users, systemd is on your horizon. |
18 |
> >> > |
19 |
> >> >> No, we don't. I hope systemd arrives soon. It's the best init |
20 |
system |
21 |
> > I |
22 |
> >> >> ever saw. |
23 |
> >> > |
24 |
> >> > What's so good about it? What will it do for me? |
25 |
> >> > |
26 |
> >> > I have this horrible sneaking suspicion that it will be more |
27 |
> > complicated |
28 |
> >> > than /sbin/init + OpenRC, just like udev + initramfs is more |
29 |
> > complicated |
30 |
> >> > than udev, and CUPS is more complicated than classical lpr. |
31 |
> >> > |
32 |
> >> > Why do you find it so good? |
33 |
> >> |
34 |
> >> No idea. I only posted this because the OP didn't say what's bad |
35 |
about |
36 |
> >> systemd :-) I really don't know I should care whether my system runs |
37 |
> >> OpenRC or systemd. |
38 |
> >> |
39 |
> >> |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > I'm the OP, and often I don't know how to express myself. |
43 |
> > |
44 |
> > It is my understanding that systemd is going to force an initramfs on |
45 |
you |
46 |
> > even if you only have / and no other partitions. (Could it be initrd |
47 |
and |
48 |
> > not initramfs?) |
49 |
> > |
50 |
> > I'm all for automounting a device when it's plugged in, if that's what |
51 |
the |
52 |
> > user chooses. But for me, with my workstation, laptop, wife's PC and |
53 |
> > daughter's laptop -- we just don't need or care for it. Seems a shame |
54 |
to be |
55 |
> > using udev and then have to completely change your system when 181 |
56 |
comes |
57 |
> > out, or freeze it at . |
58 |
> > |
59 |
> > Therefore, we don't install anything to automount devices. We have |
60 |
lines |
61 |
> > such as these in fstab: |
62 |
> > |
63 |
> > UUID=6C5F-3742 /Libby-Vivitar vfat |
64 |
> > noauto,users,rw,gid=100,dmask=0002,fmask=0113 0 0 |
65 |
> > |
66 |
> > for those devices we own. When we get a new device, we add a new line. |
67 |
> > |
68 |
> > We don't use a DE either, just Fluxbox. |
69 |
> > |
70 |
> > The bottom line is that I don't like things being forced on me (hint, |
71 |
"get |
72 |
> > the vaseline, they're on the way!") And I don't like upstream forcing |
73 |
such |
74 |
> > nefarious changes on the distros. And for the Lennart fanboi, his |
75 |
coding is |
76 |
> > so questionable that "Lennartware" has become derogatory slang. (Of |
77 |
course, |
78 |
> > you already know that.) |
79 |
> |
80 |
> No need to get personal man, relax. |
81 |
|
82 |
I disagree ... there's every reason to get personal. Not getting personal |
83 |
doesn't assign the blame. Men stand up and take responsibility for their |
84 |
actions. |
85 |
|
86 |
> I'm getting my PhD in Computer Science |
87 |
<snip> |
88 |
|
89 |
I got my PhD in life before your parents met. So what? Just saying... |
90 |
|
91 |
> So again, please, [citation needed]. You still haven't provided any |
92 |
> reference to support your claim that Lennart's code (specifically |
93 |
> systemd's code) is "poorly" done. |
94 |
|
95 |
Mate, have you heard of the world wide web? The internet? |
96 |
|
97 |
> Regards. |
98 |
> -- |
99 |
> Canek Peláez Valdés |
100 |
|
101 |
Seriously, mate ... are you his boyfriend, on his payroll, related, or |
102 |
what? |
103 |
|
104 |
You search LKML for yourself. I've been there since 2003 and have numerous |
105 |
memories. |
106 |
|
107 |
How about: |
108 |
http://www.change.org/petitions/lennart-poettering-stop-writing-useless-programs-systemd-journal |
109 |
|
110 |
Sorry, mate ... many of us here are allergic to FUD <:-)} |
111 |
-- |
112 |
Happy Penguin Computers >`) |
113 |
126 Fenco Drive ( \ |
114 |
Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ |
115 |
662-269-2706; 662-491-8613 |
116 |
support at happypenguincomputers dot com |
117 |
http://www.happypenguincomputers.com |