| 1 |
On Thursday 29 Sep 2011 18:35:13 Spidey / Claudio wrote: |
| 2 |
> Deleting files were slow as hell too. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Hmm ... no, not here. Reiser4 pretty much blew the doors off anything else I |
| 5 |
have ever used in Linux land. (I have not tried btrfs yet). |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I can't even blame reiser4 for the 'temperamental' behaviour that I mentioned |
| 8 |
earlier with any degree of certainty. Some people have blamed kernel patches |
| 9 |
that borked reiser4, so heed Volker's earlier comment. I have also found some |
| 10 |
gcc versions not being particularly friendly to it. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
The only repetitive failure modes I noticed where I could definitely blame the |
| 13 |
fs were: |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
a) recovery after power failure (unlike e.g. good ol' reiserfs) |
| 16 |
b) running out of space on a partition. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Once these two failure modes are guarded against the fs was performing as |
| 19 |
expected. |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Regards, |
| 22 |
Mick |
Archives