1 |
On Fri, 11 May 2012 01:18:18 -0400 |
2 |
Joshua Murphy <poisonbl@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Michael Scherer |
5 |
> <a6702894@××××××××××××××.at> wrote: |
6 |
> > I'm always replying to gentoo-user@l.g.o and I'm not |
7 |
> > aware I ever used |
8 |
> > one of the addresses you mentioned below. I'm rather new to this |
9 |
> > forum, so it's |
10 |
> > entirely possible I did something wrong somewhere, so please tell |
11 |
> > me where else |
12 |
> > I should post my replies. |
13 |
> > And if you feel the urge to correct me on my postings you might as |
14 |
> > well post some |
15 |
> > advice on my problem too. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > michael |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > -- |
21 |
> > Michael Scherer |
22 |
> > Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie |
23 |
> > email: michael.scherer@×××××××××××××.at |
24 |
> > phone: +43 6991 941 22 54 |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stroller" |
27 |
> >> <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> |
28 |
> >> To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
29 |
> >> Sent: Thursday, 10 May, 2012 23:08 |
30 |
> >> |
31 |
> >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails |
32 |
> >> |
33 |
> >> |
34 |
> >> |
35 |
> >> On 10 May 2012, at 15:20, Michael Scherer wrote: |
36 |
> >>> |
37 |
> >>> |
38 |
> >>> References: <4FAA2F0D.8080900@×××××.com> |
39 |
> >>> <4FAA595A.4040202@×××××××××××.org> |
40 |
> >>> |
41 |
> >>> <CAK2H+ec30vQ09U22vAc72hSQBJb2ZN5b25snH6-D3cDXrReHSA@××××××××××.com> |
42 |
> >>> |
43 |
> >>> <CAA2qdGW8UuF3H-CBiqn48f+Pboj3AhCT2WhDd1SwzE-g7z_MJg@××××××××××.com> |
44 |
> >>> |
45 |
> >>> after downloading the 3.2.12-sources everything went fine |
46 |
> >>> for a couple of weeks, I compiled them a couple of times, |
47 |
> >>> but suddenly, maybe because of some world-updates, errors |
48 |
> >>> started to accumulate, … |
49 |
> >> |
50 |
> >> |
51 |
> >> |
52 |
> >> Please don't hijack threads like this: |
53 |
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking |
54 |
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/linux.gentoo.user/msg/8a540add45e7e9b8? |
55 |
> >> |
56 |
> >> "It is irritating for people using thread-aware e-mail clients... |
57 |
> >> In case you didn't know, it happens when you use "reply" for |
58 |
> >> sending a new question instead of composing a "new" message." |
59 |
> >> |
60 |
> >> Stroller. |
61 |
> >> |
62 |
> >> |
63 |
> |
64 |
> He pulled those addresses from the message headers that went out with |
65 |
> your initial question, which it appears you sent, aiming to start a |
66 |
> new thread of discussion on, by hitting reply in the midst of |
67 |
> "[gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good?" and changing the |
68 |
> subject. It's a quick way to get a message headed towards the list, |
69 |
> but it *does* throw clients that are better at thread tracking for a |
70 |
> bit of a loop (and makes it easy for your question to get lost in an |
71 |
> already 40+ message long thread). As for your initial question, |
72 |
> building from your config on a clean (distclean, no ccache, etc) |
73 |
> 3.1.12 gentoo patched tree built rather quick and problem free on my |
74 |
> box here (using -j5 at that. My first guess was a race issue in a |
75 |
> parallel build)... You might find something notably different in your |
76 |
> versions of things, so here's what I'm running on there. |
77 |
> |
78 |
> lanos linux-3.2.12-gentoo # emerge --info |
79 |
> Portage 2.1.10.49 (default/linux/amd64/10.0, gcc-4.5.3, |
80 |
> glibc-2.14.1-r3, 3.2.1-gentoo-r2-lanos x86_64) |
81 |
> ================================================================= |
82 |
> System uname: |
83 |
> Linux-3.2.1-gentoo-r2-lanos-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_Quad_CPU_Q6600_@_2.40GHz-with-gentoo-2.0.3 |
84 |
> Timestamp of tree: Mon, 07 May 2012 17:30:01 +0000 |
85 |
> app-shells/bash: 4.2_p20 dev-lang/python: 2.7.2-r3, |
86 |
> 3.1.4-r3, 3.2.2 dev-util/pkgconfig: 0.26 |
87 |
> sys-apps/baselayout: 2.0.3 |
88 |
> sys-apps/openrc: 0.9.8.4 |
89 |
> sys-apps/sandbox: 2.5 |
90 |
> sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.68 |
91 |
> sys-devel/automake: 1.11.1 |
92 |
> sys-devel/binutils: 2.21.1-r1 |
93 |
> sys-devel/gcc: 4.5.3-r2 |
94 |
> sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.5-r2 |
95 |
> sys-devel/libtool: 2.4-r1 |
96 |
> sys-devel/make: 3.82-r1 |
97 |
> sys-kernel/linux-headers: 3.1 (virtual/os-headers) |
98 |
> sys-libs/glibc: 2.14.1-r3 |
99 |
> |
100 |
> If you're running something newer somewhere, or vanilla-sources, or |
101 |
> somesuch I can poke around a bit and see if I can replicate your |
102 |
> troubles here, but I can't guarantee short timeframes... I've around |
103 |
> 1k miles of travelling this weekend, half of which will be learning |
104 |
> quickly whether the car I just grabbed on ebay was a good idea or not. |
105 |
> |
106 |
|
107 |
I have the exact same hard- and software as described in your list, |
108 |
but the result doesn't change. Below is the command that should create |
109 |
mounts.o but for some reason can't make it: |
110 |
|
111 |
init/.do_mounts.o.cmd:cmd_init/do_mounts.o := gcc -Wp,-MD,init/.do_mounts.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.3/include -I/usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/arch/x86/include -Iarch/x86/include/generated -Iinclude -include /usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/include/linux/kconfig.h -D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wno-format-security -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -O2 -m64 -march=k8 -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time -maccumulate-outgoing-args -fstack-protector -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SECTIONS=1 -DCONFIG_AS_FXSAVEQ=1 -pipe -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -Wframe-larger-than=2048 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fno-inline-functions-called-once -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow -fconserve-stack -DCC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=\#s" -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(do_mounts)" -D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(mounts)" -c -o init/do_mounts.o init/do_mounts.c |
112 |
|
113 |
The define for making mounts.o is there, but maybe you can find |
114 |
something wrong where I can't. |
115 |
|
116 |
Thanks |
117 |
|
118 |
michael |