Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Joshua Murphy <poisonbl@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 05:20:05
Message-Id: CAOTuDKrCf_xSO668Ut4mmL_7_3T4q-CBu-ZGcDN1A=pUrsAfWg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails by Michael Scherer
1 On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Michael Scherer
2 <a6702894@××××××××××××××.at> wrote:
3 > I'm always replying to gentoo-user@l.g.o and I'm not aware I ever
4 > used
5 > one of the addresses you mentioned below. I'm rather new to this forum, so
6 > it's
7 > entirely possible I did something wrong somewhere, so please tell me where
8 > else
9 > I should post my replies.
10 > And if you feel the urge to correct me on my postings you might as well post
11 > some
12 > advice on my problem too.
13 >
14 >
15 > michael
16 >
17 > --
18 > Michael Scherer
19 > Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
20 > email: michael.scherer@×××××××××××××.at
21 > phone: +43 6991 941 22 54
22 >
23 >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stroller"
24 >> <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
25 >> To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
26 >> Sent: Thursday, 10 May, 2012 23:08
27 >>
28 >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
29 >>
30 >>
31 >>
32 >> On 10 May 2012, at 15:20, Michael Scherer wrote:
33 >>>
34 >>>
35 >>> References: <4FAA2F0D.8080900@×××××.com>
36 >>>        <4FAA595A.4040202@×××××××××××.org>
37 >>>
38 >>>  <CAK2H+ec30vQ09U22vAc72hSQBJb2ZN5b25snH6-D3cDXrReHSA@××××××××××.com>
39 >>>
40 >>>  <CAA2qdGW8UuF3H-CBiqn48f+Pboj3AhCT2WhDd1SwzE-g7z_MJg@××××××××××.com>
41 >>>
42 >>> after downloading the 3.2.12-sources everything went fine
43 >>> for a couple of weeks, I compiled them a couple of times,
44 >>> but suddenly, maybe because of some world-updates, errors
45 >>> started to accumulate, …
46 >>
47 >>
48 >>
49 >> Please don't hijack threads like this:
50 >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking
51 >> http://groups.google.com/group/linux.gentoo.user/msg/8a540add45e7e9b8?
52 >>
53 >> "It is irritating for people using thread-aware e-mail clients...
54 >> In case you didn't know, it happens when you use "reply" for sending
55 >> a new question instead of composing a "new" message."
56 >>
57 >> Stroller.
58 >>
59 >>
60
61 He pulled those addresses from the message headers that went out with
62 your initial question, which it appears you sent, aiming to start a
63 new thread of discussion on, by hitting reply in the midst of
64 "[gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good?" and changing the
65 subject. It's a quick way to get a message headed towards the list,
66 but it *does* throw clients that are better at thread tracking for a
67 bit of a loop (and makes it easy for your question to get lost in an
68 already 40+ message long thread). As for your initial question,
69 building from your config on a clean (distclean, no ccache, etc)
70 3.1.12 gentoo patched tree built rather quick and problem free on my
71 box here (using -j5 at that. My first guess was a race issue in a
72 parallel build)... You might find something notably different in your
73 versions of things, so here's what I'm running on there.
74
75 lanos linux-3.2.12-gentoo # emerge --info
76 Portage 2.1.10.49 (default/linux/amd64/10.0, gcc-4.5.3,
77 glibc-2.14.1-r3, 3.2.1-gentoo-r2-lanos x86_64)
78 =================================================================
79 System uname: Linux-3.2.1-gentoo-r2-lanos-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_Quad_CPU_Q6600_@_2.40GHz-with-gentoo-2.0.3
80 Timestamp of tree: Mon, 07 May 2012 17:30:01 +0000
81 app-shells/bash: 4.2_p20
82 dev-lang/python: 2.7.2-r3, 3.1.4-r3, 3.2.2
83 dev-util/pkgconfig: 0.26
84 sys-apps/baselayout: 2.0.3
85 sys-apps/openrc: 0.9.8.4
86 sys-apps/sandbox: 2.5
87 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.68
88 sys-devel/automake: 1.11.1
89 sys-devel/binutils: 2.21.1-r1
90 sys-devel/gcc: 4.5.3-r2
91 sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.5-r2
92 sys-devel/libtool: 2.4-r1
93 sys-devel/make: 3.82-r1
94 sys-kernel/linux-headers: 3.1 (virtual/os-headers)
95 sys-libs/glibc: 2.14.1-r3
96
97 If you're running something newer somewhere, or vanilla-sources, or
98 somesuch I can poke around a bit and see if I can replicate your
99 troubles here, but I can't guarantee short timeframes... I've around
100 1k miles of travelling this weekend, half of which will be learning
101 quickly whether the car I just grabbed on ebay was a good idea or not.
102
103 --
104 Poison [BLX]
105 Joshua M. Murphy

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails Michael Scherer <a6702894@××××××××××××××.at>
Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails Michael Scherer <a6702894@××××××××××××××.at>