Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Scherer <a6702894@××××××××××××××.at>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:01:48
Message-Id: 20120511145958.26756e9c@unet.univie.ac.at
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails by Joshua Murphy
1 On Fri, 11 May 2012 01:18:18 -0400
2 Joshua Murphy <poisonbl@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Michael Scherer
5 > <a6702894@××××××××××××××.at> wrote:
6 > > I'm always replying to gentoo-user@l.g.o and I'm not
7 > > aware I ever used
8 > > one of the addresses you mentioned below. I'm rather new to this
9 > > forum, so it's
10 > > entirely possible I did something wrong somewhere, so please tell
11 > > me where else
12 > > I should post my replies.
13 > > And if you feel the urge to correct me on my postings you might as
14 > > well post some
15 > > advice on my problem too.
16 > >
17 > >
18 > > michael
19 > >
20 > > --
21 > > Michael Scherer
22 > > Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
23 > > email: michael.scherer@×××××××××××××.at
24 > > phone: +43 6991 941 22 54
25 > >
26 > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stroller"
27 > >> <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
28 > >> To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
29 > >> Sent: Thursday, 10 May, 2012 23:08
30 > >>
31 > >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
32 > >>
33 > >>
34 > >>
35 > >> On 10 May 2012, at 15:20, Michael Scherer wrote:
36 > >>>
37 > >>>
38 > >>> References: <4FAA2F0D.8080900@×××××.com>
39 > >>>        <4FAA595A.4040202@×××××××××××.org>
40 > >>>
41 > >>>  <CAK2H+ec30vQ09U22vAc72hSQBJb2ZN5b25snH6-D3cDXrReHSA@××××××××××.com>
42 > >>>
43 > >>>  <CAA2qdGW8UuF3H-CBiqn48f+Pboj3AhCT2WhDd1SwzE-g7z_MJg@××××××××××.com>
44 > >>>
45 > >>> after downloading the 3.2.12-sources everything went fine
46 > >>> for a couple of weeks, I compiled them a couple of times,
47 > >>> but suddenly, maybe because of some world-updates, errors
48 > >>> started to accumulate, …
49 > >>
50 > >>
51 > >>
52 > >> Please don't hijack threads like this:
53 > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking
54 > >> http://groups.google.com/group/linux.gentoo.user/msg/8a540add45e7e9b8?
55 > >>
56 > >> "It is irritating for people using thread-aware e-mail clients...
57 > >> In case you didn't know, it happens when you use "reply" for
58 > >> sending a new question instead of composing a "new" message."
59 > >>
60 > >> Stroller.
61 > >>
62 > >>
63 >
64 > He pulled those addresses from the message headers that went out with
65 > your initial question, which it appears you sent, aiming to start a
66 > new thread of discussion on, by hitting reply in the midst of
67 > "[gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good?" and changing the
68 > subject. It's a quick way to get a message headed towards the list,
69 > but it *does* throw clients that are better at thread tracking for a
70 > bit of a loop (and makes it easy for your question to get lost in an
71 > already 40+ message long thread). As for your initial question,
72 > building from your config on a clean (distclean, no ccache, etc)
73 > 3.1.12 gentoo patched tree built rather quick and problem free on my
74 > box here (using -j5 at that. My first guess was a race issue in a
75 > parallel build)... You might find something notably different in your
76 > versions of things, so here's what I'm running on there.
77 >
78 > lanos linux-3.2.12-gentoo # emerge --info
79 > Portage 2.1.10.49 (default/linux/amd64/10.0, gcc-4.5.3,
80 > glibc-2.14.1-r3, 3.2.1-gentoo-r2-lanos x86_64)
81 > =================================================================
82 > System uname:
83 > Linux-3.2.1-gentoo-r2-lanos-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_Quad_CPU_Q6600_@_2.40GHz-with-gentoo-2.0.3
84 > Timestamp of tree: Mon, 07 May 2012 17:30:01 +0000
85 > app-shells/bash: 4.2_p20 dev-lang/python: 2.7.2-r3,
86 > 3.1.4-r3, 3.2.2 dev-util/pkgconfig: 0.26
87 > sys-apps/baselayout: 2.0.3
88 > sys-apps/openrc: 0.9.8.4
89 > sys-apps/sandbox: 2.5
90 > sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.68
91 > sys-devel/automake: 1.11.1
92 > sys-devel/binutils: 2.21.1-r1
93 > sys-devel/gcc: 4.5.3-r2
94 > sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.5-r2
95 > sys-devel/libtool: 2.4-r1
96 > sys-devel/make: 3.82-r1
97 > sys-kernel/linux-headers: 3.1 (virtual/os-headers)
98 > sys-libs/glibc: 2.14.1-r3
99 >
100 > If you're running something newer somewhere, or vanilla-sources, or
101 > somesuch I can poke around a bit and see if I can replicate your
102 > troubles here, but I can't guarantee short timeframes... I've around
103 > 1k miles of travelling this weekend, half of which will be learning
104 > quickly whether the car I just grabbed on ebay was a good idea or not.
105 >
106
107 Hi all,
108
109 thanks for advice, I wont make the same error again.
110
111 I use plain old gentoo-sources, but for once I'll have a shot at
112 some other kernel, maybe this could give me at least a hint.
113 I'll check your versions, I already thought some update broke
114 the kernel compile. Hope I'll find something.
115
116 thanks again
117
118 michael