Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mark Shields <laebshade@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] LVM for data drives but not the OS
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 03:00:05
Message-Id: BANLkTi=0SK87G-MCSPfWwQr8cVmJvzN8+A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] LVM for data drives but not the OS by Dale
1 On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
2
3 > Hi,
4 >
5 > Quick question about LVM. I have a 750Gb drive that has miscellaneous
6 > stuff on it. Stuff likes videos, music, pictures, ISO files and a few other
7 > things. It's not full yet but it is working on it. I have my OS on sda.
8 > The large drive is on sdc. If I buy another drive it should be sdd. I
9 > think this is possible from what I have read but want to make sure. Could I
10 > put sdc and sdd on LVM but the OS remain as it is with LVM not involved at
11 > all? Basically, my OS stays just like it is and is not touched my LVM at
12 > all but the two larger drives are managed by LVM.
13 >
14 > I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put my OS on.
15 > Just my personal opinion on LVM.
16 >
17 > If there is a better solution to link two large drives, I'm open to those
18 > ideas as well. LVM is all I can think of is why I mention it.
19 >
20 > Thanks.
21 >
22 > Dale
23 >
24 > :-) :-)
25 >
26 >
27 I know I'm late to the game with a reply, but a couple of months ago, I
28 setup a data box running Gentoo in the following configuration:
29
30 OS drive: 250 GB PATA LVM2
31 data drives: 2 x WD Caviar Black 3 TB, raid1, LVM2
32
33 Had to partition those drives using parted, though.
34
35 If that setup works fine -- and it does -- you'll have no issues.