1 |
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Hi, |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Quick question about LVM. I have a 750Gb drive that has miscellaneous |
6 |
> stuff on it. Stuff likes videos, music, pictures, ISO files and a few other |
7 |
> things. It's not full yet but it is working on it. I have my OS on sda. |
8 |
> The large drive is on sdc. If I buy another drive it should be sdd. I |
9 |
> think this is possible from what I have read but want to make sure. Could I |
10 |
> put sdc and sdd on LVM but the OS remain as it is with LVM not involved at |
11 |
> all? Basically, my OS stays just like it is and is not touched my LVM at |
12 |
> all but the two larger drives are managed by LVM. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put my OS on. |
15 |
> Just my personal opinion on LVM. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> If there is a better solution to link two large drives, I'm open to those |
18 |
> ideas as well. LVM is all I can think of is why I mention it. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Thanks. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Dale |
23 |
> |
24 |
> :-) :-) |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
I know I'm late to the game with a reply, but a couple of months ago, I |
28 |
setup a data box running Gentoo in the following configuration: |
29 |
|
30 |
OS drive: 250 GB PATA LVM2 |
31 |
data drives: 2 x WD Caviar Black 3 TB, raid1, LVM2 |
32 |
|
33 |
Had to partition those drives using parted, though. |
34 |
|
35 |
If that setup works fine -- and it does -- you'll have no issues. |