Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: hawat.thufir@×××××.com
To: hawat.thufir@×××××.com
Cc: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount, submount... which is best for Gentoo?
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:01:06
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.64.0603231505210.18737@ybpnyubfg.ybpnyqbznva
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount, submount... which is best for Gentoo? by hawat.thufir@gmail.com
1 On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, hawat.thufir@×××××.com wrote:
2
3 > From: hawat.thufir@×××××.com
4 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount,
5 > submount... which is best for Gentoo?
6 >
7 > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Jochen Schalanda wrote:
8 >
9 >> From: Jochen Schalanda <Jochen@×××××××××.de>
10 >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount,
11 >> submount... which is best for Gentoo?
12 >> Newsgroups: linux.gentoo.user
13 >>
14 >> On 10/13/2004 11:10 PM, Felix Tiede wrote:
15 >>
16 >> > submount is supposed to supersede supermount as supermount is running
17 >> in
18 >> > kernel-space, while submount is a user-space-tool.
19 >>
20 >> I think that is not quite correct. submount is a kernel module, hence it
21 >> runs in kernel space. A userspace solution for automounting would be
22 >> dbus+hal+ivman or gnome-volume-manager.
23 >>
24 >> I tried supermount, submount, and dbus+hal+ivman and at the moment I like
25 >> submount best since it perfectly fits my needs. But as already said, all
26 >> the programs (automount, supermount, submount, ivman) have a slightly
27 >> different featureset, so one should really try them all and decide
28 >> afterwards which one to choose.
29 >>
30 >> Jochen
31 >
32 >
33 > Very informative, thanks. I think I'll go with submount.
34 >
35 >
36 > -Thufir
37 >
38 >
39
40
41
42
43 localhost ~ #
44 localhost ~ #
45 localhost ~ # emerge -vp submount
46
47 These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
48
49 Calculating dependencies ...done!
50 [ebuild N ] sys-fs/submount-0.9-r2 159 kB
51
52 Total size of downloads: 159 kB
53 localhost ~ # emerge submount
54 Calculating dependencies ...done!
55 >>> emerge (1 of 1) sys-fs/submount-0.9-r2 to /
56 >>> Downloading
57 http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/submount-2.4-0.9.tar.gz
58 --15:04:32--
59 http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/submount-2.4-0.9.tar.gz
60 => `/usr/portage/distfiles/submount-2.4-0.9.tar.gz'
61 Resolving distfiles.gentoo.org... 64.50.238.52, 64.50.236.52,
62 216.165.129.135, ...
63 Connecting to distfiles.gentoo.org|64.50.238.52|:80... connected.
64 HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
65 Length: 88,203 (86K) [application/x-gzip]
66
67 100%[====================================>] 88,203 26.49K/s ETA
68 00:00
69
70 15:04:36 (26.47 KB/s) - `/usr/portage/distfiles/submount-2.4-0.9.tar.gz'
71 saved [88203/88203]
72
73 >>> Downloading http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/submount-0.9.tar.gz
74 --15:04:36-- http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/submount-0.9.tar.gz
75 => `/usr/portage/distfiles/submount-0.9.tar.gz'
76 Resolving distfiles.gentoo.org... 64.50.238.52, 64.50.236.52,
77 216.165.129.135, ...
78 Connecting to distfiles.gentoo.org|64.50.238.52|:80... connected.
79 HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
80 Length: 75,476 (74K) [application/x-gzip]
81
82 100%[====================================>] 75,476 64.24K/s
83
84 15:04:38 (64.11 KB/s) - `/usr/portage/distfiles/submount-0.9.tar.gz' saved
85 [75476/75476]
86
87 >>> md5 files ;-) submount-0.9-r2.ebuild
88 >>> md5 files ;-) files/digest-submount-0.9-r2
89 >>> md5 src_uri ;-) submount-2.4-0.9.tar.gz
90 >>> md5 src_uri ;-) submount-0.9.tar.gz
91 * Determining the location of the kernel source code
92 * Found kernel source directory:
93 * /usr/src/linux
94 * Could not find a usable .config in the kernel source directory.
95 * Please ensure that /usr/src/linux points to a configured set of Linux
96 sources.
97 * If you are using KBUILD_OUTPUT, please set the environment var so that
98 * it points to the necessary object directory so that it might find
99 .config.
100
101 !!! ERROR: sys-fs/submount-0.9-r2 failed.
102 !!! Function linux-info_pkg_setup, Line 537, Exitcode 1
103 !!! Unable to calculate Linux Kernel version
104 !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status
105 message.
106
107 localhost ~ #
108 localhost ~ # date
109 Thu Mar 23 15:05:01 GMT 2006
110 localhost ~ #
111
112
113
114
115 I'm not sure what's meant by the topmost build error, but as it's not too
116 large, I included everything.
117
118
119 -Thufir
120 --
121 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount, submount... which is best for Gentoo? Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount, submount... which is best for Gentoo? Holly Bostick <motub@××××××.nl>