1 |
Dale writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Jarry wrote: |
4 |
>> On 26-May-12 22:01, Dale wrote: |
5 |
>>> Jarry wrote: |
6 |
>>>> |
7 |
>>>> after updating baselayout from 2.0.3 to 2.1-r1 /run is mounted |
8 |
>>>> as tmpfs. But I can not find any mount-option for controlling |
9 |
>>>> how much memory is (or could be) used for it. |
10 |
>>>> |
11 |
>>>> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on |
12 |
>>>> tmpfs 8223848 224 8223624 1% /run |
13 |
>>>> |
14 |
>>>> I know it does not use 8GB right now, yet I'd like to reduce |
15 |
>>>> it to some lower value, not half of my physical memory. |
16 |
>>>> How can I do it? Can I simply add line in fstab like: |
17 |
>>>> |
18 |
>>>> none /run tmpfs size=128m 0 0 ??? |
19 |
|
20 |
Just try it :) I don't know if this would work, probably yes. But you |
21 |
can change it later with mount -o remount,size=128m /run |
22 |
|
23 |
>>> Holy smoke ! Mine is doing the same thing. |
24 |
>>> tmpfs 7.9G 260K 7.9G 1% /run |
25 |
>>> |
26 |
>>> But I also have this: |
27 |
>>> tmpfs 7.9G 0 7.9G 0% /var/tmp/portage |
28 |
|
29 |
Now have a look at /dev/shm... |
30 |
|
31 |
>>> So, between those two, I could run out of ram since I have 16Gbs. |
32 |
|
33 |
But only if you copy stuff to /run yourself, otherwise this will never |
34 |
happen. |
35 |
|
36 |
>>> There is now TWO people that needs a answer to this question. Why does |
37 |
>>> it need that much anyway? It looks to me like a few hundred Mbs, like |
38 |
>>> Jarry posted, would be plenty. Jeepers creepers. lol |
39 |
|
40 |
It doesn't need it, it's just the maximum sitze, which it will never reach. |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
>> I suppose default size for tmpfs is half of physical memory, |
44 |
>> if it is not configured somewhere else. |
45 |
>> |
46 |
>> BTW, is there any way to turn this great feature off? |
47 |
>> What is it good for? I do not see any advantage in having |
48 |
>> /run on tmpfs... |
49 |
|
50 |
In case of power failure or lockup, the contents are lost, and will not |
51 |
cause confusion on the next reboot when /run is still populated by |
52 |
stuff. Just an idea, I do not know if it would really matter. |
53 |
But it does no harm, so why not juest keep it like it is. |
54 |
|
55 |
|
56 |
> I had no idea it was doing this either until your post. I got the same |
57 |
> questions as you do. Why is it there? Why so much is allocated to it? |
58 |
> Where can we change the settings for this questionable "feature"? |
59 |
> |
60 |
> I'm hoping someone will come along and answer both our questions. I'm |
61 |
> really hoping for a place we can change the settings. I don't mind it |
62 |
> being there so much if it is useful. I would like to know its purpose |
63 |
> tho. |
64 |
|
65 |
I don't know the details, but I'd think it does not matter. There will |
66 |
nothing be put into /run that uses a lot of memory, so it will never |
67 |
actually use its default size of half of your RAM. |
68 |
|
69 |
Wonko |