| 1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 28 May 2016 20:48:37 -0700, Daniel Frey wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>> Furthermore, the current portage doesn't require the revdep-rebuild |
| 5 |
>>> step because |
| 6 |
>>> of the @preserved-rebuild set creation. |
| 7 |
>> I beg to differ, portage still misses stuff more often than you think. I |
| 8 |
>> always run revdep-rebuild after an emerge. |
| 9 |
> I have a weekly system health check cron job that includes revdep-rebuild |
| 10 |
> -pi (hint to Alan: that's the correct way to have revdep-rebuild ignore |
| 11 |
> the results of previous runs). It rarely finds anything. There's still |
| 12 |
> the occasional glitch with preserved-libs, but I fons it works |
| 13 |
> ninety-lots % of the time, and it is far better than the "let it break |
| 14 |
> then try to fix it approach" of the days we needed to rely on |
| 15 |
> revdep-rebuild. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I respectfully disagree, my migraine quotient was much lower under that |
| 18 |
approach than with what's going on now. =| |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
IQ is a measure of how stupid you feel. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Powers are not rights. |
Archives