| 1 |
On Sat, 28 May 2016 20:48:37 -0700, Daniel Frey wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Furthermore, the current portage doesn't require the revdep-rebuild |
| 4 |
> > step because |
| 5 |
> > of the @preserved-rebuild set creation. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I beg to differ, portage still misses stuff more often than you think. I |
| 8 |
> always run revdep-rebuild after an emerge. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I have a weekly system health check cron job that includes revdep-rebuild |
| 11 |
-pi (hint to Alan: that's the correct way to have revdep-rebuild ignore |
| 12 |
the results of previous runs). It rarely finds anything. There's still |
| 13 |
the occasional glitch with preserved-libs, but I fons it works |
| 14 |
ninety-lots % of the time, and it is far better than the "let it break |
| 15 |
then try to fix it approach" of the days we needed to rely on |
| 16 |
revdep-rebuild. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
God is real, unless specifically declared integer. |
Archives