Archives
Archives
| From: | Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] VMWare Hypervisor - SD vs CF card? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:53:56 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4FE1AB5C.7050002@libertytrek.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] VMWare Hypervisor - SD vs CF card? by Michael Mol |
||
| 1 | On 2012-06-19 10:28 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > CF is really behind the times. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Really? Nothing I've read indicates that - can you point me to something |
| 5 | that discusses how/why Cf is 'behind the times'? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I'm serious, I just ordered the CF adapter/cards, but I'm fully prepared |
| 8 | to send them back if you can show me something authoritative that backs |
| 9 | up that claim... |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Thanks, |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Charles |