| 1 |
On 22 November 2011 10:45, Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@×××××.fr> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> The 22/11/11, Joerg Schilling wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > You seem to miss the fact that you are using gsed instead of sed. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > using -r makes scripts non-portable. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> You seem to miss the fact that the OP didn't asked for a portable script |
| 10 |
> and didn't even talked about any system specification. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> So, it's _welcome_ to suppose he's using the most available implementation |
| 13 |
> of sed on Linux distribution which is GNU sed. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
A: You are not using the original release of sed from 1973!! |
| 17 |
B: I'm using sed-justforme, with the --magic option. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I'm pretty sure that on a linux mailing list, that the chances that he's |
| 20 |
asking for a GNU-sed compatible regex are pretty strong. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Can't we all just get along? :) |
Archives