| 1 |
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 19:26, James Broadhead <jamesbroadhead@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 22 November 2011 10:45, Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@×××××.fr> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> The 22/11/11, Joerg Schilling wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> > You seem to miss the fact that you are using gsed instead of sed. |
| 7 |
>> > |
| 8 |
>> > using -r makes scripts non-portable. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> You seem to miss the fact that the OP didn't asked for a portable script |
| 11 |
>> and didn't even talked about any system specification. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> So, it's _welcome_ to suppose he's using the most available implementation |
| 14 |
>> of sed on Linux distribution which is GNU sed. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> A: You are not using the original release of sed from 1973!! |
| 17 |
> B: I'm using sed-justforme, with the --magic option. |
| 18 |
> I'm pretty sure that on a linux mailing list, that the chances that he's |
| 19 |
> asking for a GNU-sed compatible regex are pretty strong. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
In addition, this is the [gentoo-user] mailing list, so it should be |
| 22 |
expected that a sed question will be answered based on the |
| 23 |
sys-apps/sed as provided by Gentoo's portage. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
If OP needs a portable (i.e., POSIX-compatible) sed, I'm sure he'll |
| 26 |
explicitly ask :-) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> Can't we all just get along? :) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Kewl! Let's we all get together for a couple pints of beer sometime :D |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
( OT: Any such thing as a GentooCon ? ) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Rgds, |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
FdS Pandu E Poluan |
| 37 |
~ IT Optimizer ~ |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
• LOPSA Member #15248 |
| 40 |
• Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com |
| 41 |
• Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan |
Archives